| 
In the United States, UFOs are
  sighted in every state, with the greatest number of reports coming from the
  Northeast and the Southwest. Generally, sightings occur in rural areas, small
  towns, and near military installations. Statistical analysis indicates that
  sightings most often occur around 9:00 p.m. with a secondary peak at about
  3:00 a.m. UFO reports are evenly distributed throughout the week, with peak
  periods of reports coming during the summer months, especially July. Since
  the modern UFO era began, there have been extraordinary numbers of sightings
  (called waves) in the United States during the years 1947, 1952, 1957, 1966,
  and 1973.  | 
| 
To find out if there have been
  UFO sightings near your town will take some investigative work on your part.
  Ask your relatives and friends if they have seen a UFO. You may be surprised
  how many people have seen UFOs but never reported their sightings. Some
  researchers suggest that only one in ten witnesses actually report their
  sighting. Check your local newspapers, especially editions published during
  the wave years listed previously, for news reports and articles about area
  UFO sightings. Most libraries have collections of old newspapers for you to
  examine. Finally, read as many good UFO books as you can. You may discover a
  UFO report from where you live.  
Many UFO reports are recorded on
  a computer database called UFOCAT. The UFOCAT computer database was started
  by Dr. David R. Saunders as part of the Condon UFO Project at the University
  of Colorado during the late 1960s. It was continued by Dr. Saunders and CUFOS
  until 1980, at which time UFOCAT contained about 106,000 entries. The UFOCAT
  project was inactive for ten years but has recently been reactivated by Dr.
  Donald Johnson, a former associate of Dr. Saunders and CUFOS board member.
  Originally stored on a mainframe computer, UFOCAT can now be maintained on a
  personal computer. Although the database lacks many cases from the 1980s, it
  is still the largest information base on UFO reports, and efforts are
  underway to add as many unrecorded cases to the system as possible. UFOCAT
  has fields to record information on dozens of report parameters, including
  date, location, weather, number of witnesses, effects on witnesses, type of
  UFO and size, and UFO maneuvers. It does not record narrative details of a
  UFO report, but instead codes the report information according to a system
  devised by Dr. Saunders. UFOCAT has been used by many serious researchers to
  study patterns in location, time, and types of UFO reports. UFOCAT
  information is available only to serious academic scholars and
  researchers.  
Although there are cases in which
  UFOs are tracked by radar (Radar-Visual sightings), radar is not considered a
  practical surveillance technique for ufology. Radar, including the
  sophisticated systems of the FAA and NORAD, has many shortcomings that limit
  its value to UFO research. A UFO may be too low for it to be detected or too
  fast to appear on the radar screen for more than a few sweeps of the antenna.
  UFOs that hover or move erratically may be filtered out by a radar's
  sophisticated computer system as ground scatter or noise. Also, planes with
  transponders return stronger radar signals than targets not so equipped, and
  radars are often tuned only to transponder signals. It is also possible that
  UFOs might not return radar signals at all.  
In spite of the inadequacies of
  radar in the search for UFOs, FAA supervisors do report "unusual air
  traffic" in their operational logs, and radar confirmation of a UFO
  sighting can help verify a report and details of a UFO's physical
  characteristics. A serious problem for ufologists, however, is that the FAA
  keeps radarscope tapes of air traffic for only two weeks, and computer
  printouts of this information can be very expensive. As a result, radar data is
  only available for cases reported immediately.  
Although rare, one Radar-Visual
  case is more significant than dozens of nocturnal light reports for
  increasing our understanding of the UFO phenomenon.  
There are three general theories
  that try to explain UFOs. They may be:  
 
1. The most popular theory (especially
  in America) is that UFOs are spacecraft built and operated by aliens from
  somewhere else in outer space. Some researchers reject the idea that they are
  space vehicles and speculate that UFOs might be another type of intelligently
  controlled device. These devices might create a holographic image that people
  see as something unexplainable, or they may stimulate the brain to create a
  hallucination that the witness interprets as a real UFO.  
Another possibility is that what
  people see as UFOs are portals or "wormholes" that connect
  different parts of our space-time continuum and are used by intelligent
  beings to move between different points in space-time. Though most proponents
  of the "intelligent beings" theory believe that the intelligence
  behind UFOs comes from outer space, others believe it originates in another
  dimension or on earth itself. A few researchers believe that secret groups of
  scientists have developed technology beyond the current capabilities of
  mainstream science.  
All of these ideas, including the
  aliens-from-outer-space theory, still lack conclusive proof and unambiguous
  evidence. Individuals who are skeptical of the existence of UFOs specifically
  direct their criticism most often against this first theory. They argue that
  the vast distances between stars would make interstellar travel nearly
  impossible. These skeptics also believe that the many varying descriptions of
  UFOs and their occupants would imply that many alien groups are visiting the
  earth, which they consider very unlikely. They also argue that aliens would
  not be so secretive about their activities and would announce their presence
  in more obvious ways. Finally, skeptics point out that there is no undeniable
  evidence, such as a truly authentic photograph or metal from a UFO, that
  would prove their existence.  
2. The second theory states that
  UFOs are unusual natural phenomena. Ball lightning is an example of a rare
  and incompletely understood phenomenon. Proponents of the "earthlight
  theory" argue that geological stresses in the earth's crust produce
  glowing balls of ionized gas that are ejected into the atmosphere. They think
  that the properties of this gas (called a plasma) may have strange effects on
  the people that come near it; plasma may stimulate areas of the brain to
  produce vivid hallucinations, which might be the basis for abduction
  cases.  
Opponents argue that the
  earthlight theory does not take into account all the data. They do not think
  that geological stress can create a plasma with the size, shape, and duration
  of reported UFOs. They also question whether an electromagnetically-induced
  hallucination could create the consistent type of memories reported by
  abductees.  
3. The third theory proposes that
  UFOs are the result of psychological or sociological factors. Many
  scientists, particularly those who are skeptical of the existence of UFOs,
  argue that all sightings are really misperceptions of natural phenomena or
  conventional aircraft. They say that these misperceptions are the result of
  the witness's ignorance, emotional state, or psychological health, or caused
  by unusual environmental conditions adversely affecting an individual's
  perception.  
Other researchers believe that
  the stresses and upheavals in modern society have created a need in many
  people to establish "contact" with UFOs or aliens. They say that
  such a need exists because modern society has rejected traditional values and
  beliefs, leaving individuals adrift with no direction or hope. Through their
  belief in UFOs and technologically superior aliens, some people can place
  their faith in something or someone who can help humanity solve its problems
  and restore purpose to the world.  
Arguments against this theory
  point out that witnesses usually describe their sightings with a certain
  level of precision and consistency. UFO reports from emotionally disturbed
  individuals are rare and easily identifiable. However, there are individuals
  who claim to have received messages from alien beings, often by
  "channeling" these messages in a trance-like state. This
  undoubtedly comes from the channelers' belief system rather than a seemingly
  objective source like the UFO phenomenon.  
Each of the three theories has
  its strengths and weaknesses. Because of the complexity of the UFO
  phenomenon, all three may explain at least a part of the mystery. Only more
  research and new data will help us solve the UFO enigma.  
Although the Center for UFO
  Studies is not specifically involved in the search for intelligent life on
  other planets, the idea that some UFOs are alien spacecraft makes this
  question somewhat relevant to ufology. While there have been many fanciful
  tales about life on other planets, most scientists search for intelligent
  life by using radio telescopes tuned to detect the emissions of other
  technologically advanced civilizations. (Projects involving the search for
  extraterrestrial intelligence are referred to by the acronym SETI.) One of
  the first organized attempts to discover extraterrestrial life was Project
  Ozma (named after the queen of Oz), which was initiated by the American radio
  astronomer, Frank Drake.  
The project tuned its telescopes to detect radio
  emissions from nearby sun-like stars, such as Tau Ceti and Epsilon Eridani.
  Although signals proving the existence of intelligent life were never
  detected, valuable information about the universe was discovered. Since
  Project Ozma, other attempts have also been made to detect extraterrestrial
  signals, with one of the longest-running efforts occurring at Ohio State University.  
Despite the lack of success in
  discovering extraterrestrial signals, most astronomers consider the
  probability for extraterrestrial life to be very high. This conclusion is
  based on the Drake equation developed by Frank Drake, who conceived it as a
  way to stimulate discussion about the search for extraterrestrial
  intelligence). Seven factors are used in the equation to determine the
  probable number of technological civilizations able and willing to transmit
  and receive radio signals. These factors include the rate of starbirth,
  number of planets around a star, planets with life, supporting environments,
  intelligent life, communicating societies, and civilization life span.  
Several scientists have also
  begun to speculate about the possibility that extraterrestrial civilizations
  have already come in contact with each other, especially in regions of the
  galaxy where stars are in close proximity. The activities of these highly
  advanced cosmic societies might be detectable on the earth, providing the evidence
  SETI projects have sought.  
Some scientists reject the idea
  that extraterrestrial life exists; a position best expressed by Enrico
  Fermi's statement (now known as the Fermi Paradox) that if extraterrestrial
  life exists in the universe, they (the extraterrestrials) should have arrived
  here by now. So where are they? The argument essentially states that if
  extraterrestrial intelligent life exists, we would have the evidence for its
  existence by now because the age of the earth would have given the extraterrestrials
  enough time to reach here. Of course, if intelligent beings exist elsewhere,
  many factors may have prevented them from contacting us, or they may have
  simply chosen not to do so. Then again, the possibility exists that the
  extraterrestrials have reached the earth. Most scientists involved in SETI
  projects, however, have not shown an interest in examining UFO data as a way
  to test this hypothesis.  
The study of the UFO phenomenon should
  not involve the issue of belief. Serious ufologists are not trying to make
  people believe in UFOs; they are trying to show that the UFO
  phenomenon--whatever it is--deserves serious scientific study. A constant
  problem ufologists face is ignorance about the subject. Even well-educated
  skeptics--often college professors--are unaware of the evidence for UFOs, the
  subject's literature, the history of government involvement and civilian
  investigations, and the details of significant cases. In fact, serious
  ufologists are often the best skeptics; they possess greater knowledge about
  the pros and cons for studying UFOs than debunkers.  
Skeptics often argue against the
  study of UFOs based upon assumptions unrelated to the evidence. They assume
  aliens would not visit the earth in the large numbers that UFO reports
  suggest or that people see UFOs because of some religious or emotional need.
  Because scientists do not study UFOs, you might assume that the evidence must
  be lacking. In practical terms, scientists generally study topics that are
  academically acceptable, have an abundance of data, and can attract funding
  from government and private sources.  
To those who remain skeptical
  about the value of UFO research, here are some suggestions:  
 
Remember that honest and serious
  skepticism requires an understanding of the data, relevant scientific and
  social research, and the world-wide history of the UFO mystery.  
First, you should call for other
  people to come and watch the UFO with you. The more witnesses, the more
  credible the report will be to investigators. Second, you should observe very
  carefully. If you have a camera, take pictures of the UFO that include known
  objects in the foreground and background. Remember as many details as
  possible, especially the time, date, duration, and location of the sighting,
  the UFO's appearance, shape, apparent size and distance, lights, colors,
  direction, estimated speed, trajectory, motions, actions, sounds, and how you
  lost sight of it. Third, after the sighting ends, write down as many details
  as you can remember. Draw a sketch of the UFO (even if you took photographs)
  and a map of the area where the sighting occurred. If the UFO left any
  physical traces or effects, protect the evidence so researchers can
  investigate and analyze it. Finally, and most importantly, contact the Center
  for UFO Studies to file your report.  
There is no formal training
  required to become a ufologist. In fact, ufology is not so much a
  professional career as it is a hobby. That is, most researchers study and
  work in this field on a voluntary basis and have educated themselves about
  the subject. If you are serious about studying UFOs, you must read the
  serious literature about the subject. You must also attend college and study
  any field you find rewarding; this will help you understand the scientific
  method and develop your critical thinking skills. It is impossible to predict
  what discipline, whether in the social or physical sciences, will contribute
  to a further understanding of the UFO phenomenon, so knowledge and
  perspective of any field of learning may shed light on the phenomenon.
  Finally, you should try to meet other persons interested in UFOs and who may
  already be involved with investigations and study. They may have books you
  can borrow and expertise you can draw upon.  | 
 
 


 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment