In the wee hours of Aug. 24, 1953,
George Van Tassel, a 43-year-old former aviation engineer, was awakened by a
man from outer space. The spaceman looked like a human. He informed Van Tassel
that his name was Solganda and that he was 700 years old. (He looked no older
than 28, Van Tassel said.) Van Tassel was ushered onto the spacecraft where he
was told that Earthlings’ reliance on metal building materials was interfering
with radio frequencies and disrupting interplanetary “thought transfers.”
Solganda also divulged a secret: a formula that Van Tassel could use to build a
remarkable machine, a device that would generate electrostatic energy to
suspend the laws of gravity, extend human life and facilitate high-speed time
travel. A circular, dome-topped
building, 38 feet tall and 55 feet in diameter, [was] constructed by Van Tassel
over the course of nearly two decades in accordance with the instructions of
his extraterrestrial architectural patron. The name that Van Tassel gave to his
time machine: the Integratron. It ... was constructed without nails,
screws, flashing or weather stripping. But it’s not the way the Integratron
looks that draws thousands to Landers each year. It’s how the place sounds. You
may not subscribe to Van Tassel’s [beliefs], but an Integratron sound bath will
startle your ears, and, perhaps, awaken your imagination. Beneath the wooden
dome, it seems at moments that you’re not listening to sound so much as
inhabiting it. It is, aesthetically speaking, extraterrestrial: a transportative
encounter with music, an experience of pure sound not quite of this earth.
If what
follows sounds like a scene from the sci-fi disaster flick Independence
Day, imagine what President George W. Bush must have thought on the night
of January 8, 2008 as he contemplated his ranch home in Crawford, Texas.
At around
8:00 pm, an enormous, hovering craft with ridiculously bright lights, at least
1,000 feet long (though some witnesses said a mile long), was tracked on
multiple radars heading straight for the president's ranch at low speed.
The craft lacked a required transponder, was totally unidentified, did
not respond to any attempts at communication, and was flying through restricted
airspace.
Stop calling UFOs
to dots in a black background, these dots can be anything, resolve the
structure behind the dots and show what is the structure of these dots.
Încetati de a
numi OZN-uri punctelor pe un fundal întunecat, aceste puncte pot fi orice, *Rezolvati
structura din spatele punctelor si aratati care este structura acestor puncte.
The use of low
optical magnification in many active observers, mainly people doing night time
observation and some doing day time observations is pervasive.
Folosirea unei joase amplieri optice este larg
raspîndita, de catre multi observatori activi, în special în rîndul persoanelor
care fac observari nocturne si unele observatii în timpul zilei.
With low optical
magnification equipment any small object not very far away will be reduced to a
dot.
Cu un echipament optic de ampliere mica, orice
obiect nu prea îndepartat, va fi redus pîna la un punct.
0.32 – Many of
these night time observers use the ***cascade image intensifier p8079hp with
50mm lens, that combination is a wide field view combination with an optical
magnification of 2x, just 2x.
0.32 – Multi dintre acesti observatori nocturni,
folosesc ***intensificatorul de imagine în cascada p8079hp cu obiectiv de 50
mm, aceasta combinatie este o combinatie de viziune ampla a cîmpului de
vizibilitate cu o ampliere optica de 2x, doar 2x.
With this kind of
setup any object of one feet span at more than 1,500 feet = 457,20
mts away will be reduced to a dot, almost any bird is
around 1 feet span = 0,30 mts, so a bird at 2000 feet away = 609,60 mts will be
reduced to a dot without any apparent wing flipping. That bird flying in a
straight line will be undistinguishable from a satellite.
Cu acest tip de configurare orice obiect la mai mult de 1500ft = 457,20m
distanta, va fi redus la un punct, aproape toate pasarile sunt de aproximativ
1picior = 0,30m de amplitudine, deci, o
pasare la 2000 picioare înaltime = 609,60 de metri de distanta, va fi redusa la
un punct, fara niciun fel de batere de aripi vizibila. Aceasta pasare care
zboara în linie dreapta, va fi indistincta de un satelit.
0.58 – The
following are the steps that are followed in this channel in the processing of
footage from any anomaly, this will show that the dots that these people have
been calling UFOs for years are very likely nothing more than anomalies.
Remember that almost as a rule these people use single digits optical
magnification equipment, really very poor.
0.58 – Urmînd se gasesc etapele care sunt
executate în acest canal, în procesarea imaginii de orice anomalie, si va arata
ca punctele pe care aceste persoane le numesc OZN-uri de ani de zile, probabil
nu sunt nimic altceva decît anomalii.Amintiti-va ca, aproape ca regula
generala, aceste persoane folosesc echipament de ampliere optica digitala, în
realitate foarte mediocre.
1.17 – This is an
anomaly spotted in IR at 26x optical magnification, just a dot like any other
dot, like the dots that many people had called UFOs for years, almost always
assuming that these are some “crafts” or mechanical artifacts.
1.17 – Aceasta este o anomalie identificata în IR (infra red = infrarosu)
cu o ampliere optica de 26x, doar un punct ca oricare altul, asa ca punctele pe
care multe persoane le-au desemnat ca OZN-uri de ani de zile, aproape
întotdeauna asumîndule ca sunt cîteva
’’nave’’ sau artefacte mecanice.
1.32 – This is
now the same dot as seen by a telephoto 1100mm lens and using in prime focus a
1/2.55 megapixels board camera, this gives 150x optical magnification, the
original resolution was 2592x1920, 2K
1.32 – Este acelasi punct vazut de catre o
lentila de 1100 mm a unui teleobiectiv si folosind ca focus principal un aparat
de fotografiat de bord de 1 / 2,55 megapixeli, care ofera o ampliere optica de
150x, rezolutia originala era de 2592x1920, 2K.
1.52 – Now that
is the cropping at half HD 960 x 540 of the lower left corner of previous
frame.
1.52 – Acum acesta este jumatatea taiata de High
Definition HD de 960x540 din coltul inferior din stînga al cadrului anterior.
2.12 – And now
this is the cropping corner expanded at full HD 1920x1080, total magnification
150x2 = 300.
2.12 – Si acum este coltul de taiere extinsa în
1920x1080 Full High Definition, o ampliere totala de 150x2 = 300.
2.32 – That is
the process followed almost always in this channel;
2.32 – Acest
process este urmat aproape întotdeauna de catre acest canal;
1 – Dot spotted
in IR, as any other dot, as the dots many call UFO without really knowing the
structure behind the dot.
1 – Punct încadrat în IR (infrarosu), ca orice
alt punct, ca punctele pe care multi le numesc OZN, fara sa cunoasca de fapt
structura în spatele punctului.
2 – That dot is
placed in the field of view of a scope with high optical magnification 150x and
a 5 megapixels camera, each frame in the footage will be 2592x 1920 pixels.
2 – Acel punct este plasat în cîmpul de vedere în ambitul unei amplieri
înalte optice de 150x si o camera de 5 megapixeli, fiecare cadru de filmare va
fi de 2592 x 1920 pixeli.
2.52 – If at that
resolution the object is an unknown (anomaly) then recording is done in the
high optical magnification scope.
2.52 – Daca, în aceasta limita de rezolutie
obiectul va fi ceva necunoscut (anomalie), atunci gravarea este facuta în
ambitul unei mari amplieri optice.
ALWAYS whenever
the dots have been unknown the object was an “anomaly”, nothing remotely
similar to any craft of any time.
Întotdeuna cînd punctele au fost percepute ca
fiind ceva necunoscut, obiectul fost
considerat o ‘’anomalie’’, niciodata considerat nici macar asemanator cu vreo
nava.
Anomalies behave
like living beings, but they defy any kind of mundane explanation.
Anomaliile se comporta ca fiintele vii, însa
sfidînd
orice explicatie pamînteasca.
3.13 – So all
these people that have been calling dots UFOs forever, do you think that
“their” dots are different from the same dots spotted by my equipment?
3.13 – Deci, toate aceste persoane care au
desemnat mereu punctele ca fiind OZN-uri, credeti ca punctele ‘’lor’’, sunt diferite
de aceleasi puncte situate de catre echipamentul meu ?
When the dots are
“resolved” anomalies are revealed, if they think that their dots are something
else then they should use better equipment and resolve their dots showing
something different.
În cazul în care punctele sunt ’’rezolvate’’, anomaliile sunt revelate. Daca
ei cred ca punctele lor sunt altceva, atunci ei ar trebui sa utilizeze un
echipament mai bun si sa rezolve punctele lor aratînd ceva diferit.
**The bar had
been raised, dots need to be resolved in their structure, otherwise how do
really know what is behind your dot?
**Sarcina a devenit mai elaborata, punctele
trebuie sa fie rezolvate în structura lor, în caz contrar, cum ati sti cu
adevarat, ce este în spatele punctului dvs. ?
Anotari:
*Rezolutia imaginii (https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rezolutia imaginii) = Rezolutia imaginii descrie nivelul de
detaliu pe care o imagine o
comporta. Termenul se aplica de asemenea la imaginile digitale,
imagini în filme si alte tipuri de imagini. Rezolutiile mai înalte înseamna mai
multe detalii în imagine.
Although
originally experimented with by the Germans in World War Two, it was not until
the 1950s that the U.S. began conducting early experiments using multiple tubes
in a "cascade", by coupling the output of an inverting tube to the
input of another tube, which allowed for increased amplification of the object
light being viewed. These experiments worked far better than expected and night
vision devices based on these tubes were able to pick up faint starlight and
produce a usable image. However, the size of these tubes, at 17 in (43 cm)
long and 3.5 in (8.9 cm) in diameter, were too large to be suitable for
military use. Known as "cascade" tubes, they provided the capability
to produce the first truly passive night vision scopes. With the advent of
fiber optic bundles in the 1960s, it was possible to connect smaller tubes
together, which allowed for the first true Starlight scopes to be
developed in 1964. Many of these tubes were used in the AN/PVS-2 rifle
scope, which saw use in Vietnam.
An alternative to
the cascade tube explored in the mid 20th century involves optical feedback, with the output
of the tube fed back into the input. This scheme has not been used in rifle
scopes, but it has been used successfully in lab applications where larger
image intensifier assemblies are acceptable.[1]
**Intensificator de Imagine în cascata
–
Desi experimentat initial de catre
germani în al Doilea Razboi Mondial, nu a fost decît începînd din decada lui
50’ ca Statele Unite au început sa conduca primele experiente folosind tuburi diferite
în ’’cascada’’ cuplînd tubul de iesire al
unui inversor, la intrarea altui tub, ceea ce a permis marirea amplificarii
luminii obiectului vizualizat. Aceste experiente au functionat mult mai bine
decît se astepta, si dispozitivele de vedere nocturna bazate pe aceste tuburi
au fost capabile sa capteze lumina slaba a stelelor si sa produca o imagine
utilizabila. Cu toate acestea, dimensiunea acestor tuburi, de 17 toli (43cm) de
lungime si 3,5 incii (8,9cm) diametru, era prea mare pentru a fi adecvat
utilizarilor militare. Cunoscute sub numele de tuburi ’’în cascada’’, ele au
oferit capacitatea de a produce primele domenii cu adevarat pasive de viziune
nocturna. Odata cu aparitia manunchiurilor de fibra optica în anii 1960, a fost
posibil sa se conecteze tuburi mai mici împreuna, ceea ce a permis prima
delimitare reala a luminii stelelor fiind dezvoltata în 1964. Multe dintre
aceste tuburi au fost folosite la tinta AN / PVS-2, care a fost utilizata în
Vietnam.
O alternativa la tubul cascada explorata
la mijlocul secolului 20, implica realimentarea optica, cu iesirea din tubul
alimentat înapoi la intrare. Acest sistem nu a fost folosit în domeniul
pustilor, însa a fost utilizat cu succes în aplicatii de laborator, unde imaginea
majora a ansamblurilor intensificatoare sunt acceptabile. [1]
***raise the bar
Fig. to make a task a little more difficult. Ex: Just as I was getting accustomed to my job, the
manager raised the bar and I had to perform even better.
A ridica stacheta. Figurativ, a face o
sarcina putin mai dificila. Exemplu: Exact
atunci cînd ma obisnuisem sa-mi fac munca mea, seful meu mi-a ridicat stacheta,
si a trebuit sa o fac si mai bine.
Stop calling UFOs to dots in a black background, these
dots can be anything, resolve the structure behind the dots and show what is
the structure of these dots.
Deja de llamar ovnis a puntos en
un fondo negro, estos puntos pueden ser cualquier cosa, resuelvan la estructura
detrás de los puntos y muestren lo que es la estructura de estos puntos.
The use of low optical magnification in many active
observers, mainly people doing night time observation and some doing day time
observations is pervasive.
El uso de magnificación óptica
baja en muchos observadores activos, principalmente la gente que hace
observaciones de noche y algunas observaciones durante el día es un fenómeno
generalizado.
With low optical magnification equipment any small
object not very far away will be reduced to a dot.
Con equipos de magnificación
óptica baja cualquier objeto pequeño, no muy lejos se reducirá a un
punto.
0.32 – Many of these night time observers use the
cascade image intensifier p8079hp with 50mm lens, that combination is a wide
field view combination with an optical magnification of 2x, just 2x.
0.32 - Muchos de estos observadores nocturnos utilizan el intensificador de imagen en cascada p8079hp con lente de 50 mm, esa combinación es una gran combinación de campo de visión con un aumento óptico de 2x, sólo 2x.
With this kind of setup any object of one feet span at
more than 1,500 feet = away will be reduced to a
dot, almost any bird is around 1 feet span, so a bird at 2000 feet away will be
reduced to a dot without any apparent wing flipping. That bird flying in a
straight line will be undistinguishable from a satellite
Con este tipo de configuración
cualquier objeto de una capacidad de 1 pie a más de 1.500 pies de distancia
= se reducirá a un punto, casi cualquier ave es de alrededor de 1 pie,
por lo que un pájaro a 2000 pies de distancia se reducirá a un punto sin
siquiera mover las alas. Ese pájaro que vuela en línea recta será
indistinguible desde un satélite.
0.58 – The following are the steps that are followed
in this channel in the processing of footage from any anomaly, this will show
that the dots that these people have been calling UFOs for years are very
likely nothing more than anomalies. Remember that almost as a rule these people
use single digits optical magnification equipment, really very poor.
0.58 - Los siguientes son los
pasos que se siguen en este canal en el procesamiento de imágenes de cualquier
anomalía, esto mostrará que los puntos que estas personas han estado llamando
ovnis desde hace años es muy probable que no sean más que anomalías. Recuerden
que casi por regla general estas personas utilizan un solo dígito en equipos de
magnificación óptica, realmente muy pobre.
1.17 – This is an anomaly spotted in IR at 26x optical
magnification, just a dot like any other dot, like the dots that many people
had called UFOs for years, almost always assuming that these are some “crafts”
or mechanical artifacts.
1.17 - Esto es una anomalía visto
en IR a una magnificación óptica 26x, sólo un punto como cualquier
otro punto, al igual que los puntos que mucha gente había llamados OVNIs
durante años, casi siempre asumiendo que estos son algunos "naves" o
artefactos mecánicos.
1.32 – This is now the same dot as seen by a telephoto
1100mm lens and using in prime focus a 1/2.55 megapixels board camera, this
gives 150x optical magnification, the original resolution was 2592x1920, 2K
1.32 - Este es ahora el mismo
punto visto por un lente teleobjetivo 1100mm y utilizando en foco principal de
una cámara a bordo de 1 / 2,55 megapíxeles, esto da aumento óptico de 150x, con
una resolución original de 2592x1920, 2K
1.52 – Now that is the cropping at half HD 960 x 540
of the lower left corner of previous frame.
1.52 - Ahora que es el cultivo en
un medio de alta definición de 960 x 540 de la esquina inferior izquierda del
cuadro anterior.
2.12 – And now this is the cropping corner expanded at
full HD 1920x1080, total magnification 150x2 = 300.
2.12 - Y ahora esta es la esquina
del cultivo expandida a 1920x1080 Full HD, aumento total 150x2 = 300.
2.32 – That is the process followed almost always in
this channel:
2.32 - Ese es el proceso que le
sigue casi siempre en este canal:
1 – Dot spotted in IR, as any other dot, as the dots
many call UFO without really knowing the structure behind the dot.
1 - Punto visto en IR (
Infrarrojo), como cualquier otro punto, como los puntos que muchos llaman OVNI
sin saber muy bien la estructura que hay detrás del punto.
2 – That dot is placed in the field of view of a scope
with high optical magnification 150x and a 5 megapixels camera, each frame in
the footage will be 2592x 1920 pixels.
2 - Ese punto se coloca en el
campo de visión de un alcance de 150x con ampliación óptica
alta y una cámara de 5 megapíxeles, cada cuadro de las imágenes tendrá 2592x
1920 píxeles.
2.52 – If at that resolution the object is an unknown
(anomaly) then recording is done in the high optical magnification scope.
2.52 - Si en esa resolución el objeto es desconocido (anomalía), luego la grabación se hace a un alcamce de alta magnificación óptica.
ALWAYS whenever the dots have been unknown the object was an “anomaly”, nothing
remotely similar to any craft of any time,
SIEMPRE siempre que los puntos se desconocen el objeto era una "anomalía", nada remotamente similar a cualquier nave de cualquier época,
Anomalies behave like living beings, but they defy any kind of mundane
explanation.
Las anomalías se comportan como seres vivos, que desafían
cualquier tipo de explicación mundana.
3.13 – So all these people that have been calling dots
UFOs forever, do you think that “their” dots are different from the same dots
spotted by my equipment?
3.13 - Así que todas estas
personas que han estado llamando puntos a los ovnis por siempre, ¿creen que
"sus" puntos son diferentes de los mismos puntos señalados por mi
equipo?
When the dots are “resolved” anomalies are revealed,
if they think that their dots are something else then they should use better
equipment and resolve their dots showing something different.
Cuando los puntos son anomalías
"resueltas" son reveladas, si piensan que sus puntos son algo más, entonces
deberían utilizar mejor equipo y resolver sus puntos mostrando algo diferente.
The bar had been raised, dots need to be resolved in
their structure, otherwise how do really know what is behind your dot?
La barra se ha levantado, los
puntos deben ser resueltos en su estructura, de lo contrario ¿cómo saber
realmente lo que está detrás de su punto?
Stop calling UFOs to dots in a black background, these dots can be
anything, resolve the structure behind the dots and show what is the structure
of these dots.
Parem de chamar UFOs aos pontos num fundo escuro, esses pontos
podem ser qualquer coisa. *Resolvam a estrutura por trás dos pontos e mostrem
qual é a estrutura desses pontos.
The use of low optical magnification in many active observers, mainly
people doing night time observation and some doing day time observations is
pervasive.
O uso de baixa ampliação óptica encontra-se generalizado por muitos
observadores activos, principalmente pelas pessoas que fazem observações
noturnas e algumas observações diurnas.
With low optical magnification equipment any small object not very far
away will be reduced to a dot.
Com um equipamento de baixa ampliação óptica, qualquer objecto
pequeno não muito distante, ficará reduzido a um ponto.
0.32 – Many of these night time observers use the ***cascade image
intensifier p8079hp with 50mm lens, that combination is a wide field view
combination with an optical magnification of 2x, just 2x.
0.32 - Muitos desses observadores noturnos usam o *intensificador
de imagem em cascata p8079hp com lente de 50mm, esta combinação é uma
combinação de ampla visão do campo com
uma ampliação óptica de 2x, apenas 2x.
With this kind of setup any object of one feet span at more than 1,500
feet = 457,20 mts away will be
reduced to a dot, almost any bird is around 1 feet span = 0,30 mts, so a bird
at 2000 feet away = 609,60 mts will be reduced to a dot without any apparent
wing flipping. That bird flying in a straight line will be undistinguishable
from a satellite.
Com este tipo de configuração qualquer objecto a mais de 1500
pés = 457,20 mts de distância será reduzido a um ponto, quase todas as aves têm
cerca de 1 pé=0, 30 mts de envergadura, portanto, um pássaro a 2000 pés =
609,60 mts de distância ficará reduzido a um ponto sem qualquer bater de asas
visível. Esse pássaro a voar em linha recta será indistinguível de um satélite.
0.58 – The following are the steps that are followed in this channel in
the processing of footage from any anomaly, this will show that the dots that
these people have been calling UFOs for years are very likely nothing more than
anomalies. Remember that almost as a rule these people use single digits
optical magnification equipment, really very poor.
0.58 - A seguir estão as etapas que são executadas neste canal,
no processamento de imagens de qualquer anomalia, e vai mostrar que os pontos que
essas pessoas designam há anos como UFOs, muito provavelmente não são nada mais
do que anomalias. Lembrem-se que, quase como regra geral, essas pessoas usam
equipamento de ampliação óptica digital, realmente muito medíocre.
1.17 – This is an anomaly spotted in IR at 26x optical magnification,
just a dot like any other dot, like the dots that many people had called UFOs
for years, almost always assuming that these are some “crafts” or mechanical
artifacts.
1.17 - Esta é uma anomalia identificada em IR (infra red = infra vermelhos) com uma
ampliação óptica de 26x, apenas um ponto como qualquer outro, como os pontos que
muitas pessoas designaram como UFOs durante anos, quase sempre assumindo que são algumas
"naves" ou artefactos mecânicos.
1.32 – This is now the same dot as seen by a telephoto 1100mm lens and
using in prime focus a 1/2.55 megapixels board camera, this gives 150x optical
magnification, the original resolution was 2592x1920, 2K
1.32 - Este é o mesmo ponto
visto por uma lente de 1100 milímetros de uma teleobjectiva e usando
como foco principal uma câmera de bordo de
1 / 2,55 megapixels, que dá uma ampliação óptica de 150x, a resolução
original era de 2592x1920, 2K
1.52 – Now that is the cropping at half HD 960 x 540 of the lower left
corner of previous frame.
1.52 - Agora este é o recorte da metade da Alta Definição HD de
960 x 540 do canto inferior esquerdo do quadro anterior.
2.12 – And now this is the cropping corner expanded at full HD
1920x1080, total magnification 150x2 = 300.
2.12 - Este é o canto do corte expandido em 1920x1080 Alta
Definição completa, uma ampliação total
de 150x2 = 300.
2.32 – That is the process followed almost
always in this channel;
2.32 - Este processo é seguido quase sempre neste canal;
1 – Dot spotted in IR, as any other dot, as
the dots many call UFO without really knowing the structure behind the dot.
1 - Ponto enquadrado em IR (infra vermermelhos), como qualquer
outro ponto, como os pontos a que muitos chamam UFO sem realmente conhecerem a
estrutura por trás do ponto.
2 – That dot is placed in the field of view of a scope with high optical
magnification 150x and a 5 megapixels camera, each frame in the footage
will be 2592x 1920
pixels.
2 - Aquele ponto está colocado no campo de
visão no âmbito de alta ampliação óptica de 150x e de uma câmera de 5 megapixeis,
cada quadro de filmagem será de 2592x 1920 pixeis.
2.52 – If at that resolution the object is
an unknown (anomaly) then recording is done in the high optical magnification
scope.
2.52 - Se,
nesse limite de resolução o objecto for algo desconhecido (anomalia), então a
gravação é feita no âmbito de uma grande ampliação óptica.
ALWAYS whenever the dots have been unknown the object was an “anomaly”,
nothing remotely similar to any craft of any time.
SEMPRE que os pontos foram percebidos como algo desconhecido,
o objecto foi considerado uma "anomalia", jamais considerado
remotamente semelhante a qualquer nave.
Anomalies behave like living beings, but they defy any kind of mundane
explanation.
As anomalias comportam-se como seres vivos, mas desafiam qualquer
tipo de explicação terrena.
3.13 – So all these people that have been
calling dots UFOs forever, do you think that “their” dots are different from
the same dots spotted by my equipment?
3.13 - Então, todas estas pessoas que designaram
para sempre os pontos como UFOs, vocês pensam que os pontos "deles"
são diferentes dos mesmos pontos localizados pelo meu equipamento?
When the dots are “resolved” anomalies are
revealed, if they think that their dots are something else then they should use
better equipment and resolve their dots showing something different.
Quando os pontos são "resolvidos", as
anomalias são reveladas. Se eles pensam que os seus pontos são outra coisa,
então deverão usar um equipamento melhor e resolver os seus pontos mostrando
algo diferente.
**The bar had been raised, dots need to be resolved in their structure,
otherwise how do really know what is behind your dot?
A tarefa tornou-se mais elaborada, os pontos
precisam ser resolvidas na sua estrutura, caso contrário, como é que realmente você
sabe o que está por trás do seu ponto?
