UFOs and Space Travel: How Do They Get Here And Where Do They Come From?

UFOs and Space Travel:

How Do They Get Here And Where Do They Come From?

19 August, 2015

Ellen Lloyd - MessageToEagle.com - One of the most interesting aspects of the UFO phenomenon focuses on the origin of extraterrestrial craft. Whether you are new to the UFO phenomena, or have studied the subject for years, you cannot help wondering: "If UFOs are real outer space craft, then where do they come from and how do they get here?"

It is a simple question and yet it is very difficult to provide an intelligent and solid answer to this query.

 

• What is the place of origin of these intelligent alien beings? 
• Can we find them in the cluster of the Pleiades, in the constellation of Orion, or do they perhaps exist much closer to home? 
• Could it be that the aliens are in fact visitors from the future? 
• Are the aliens perhaps living in a world next to our own, a place that is invisible to the naked eye, a parallel world or another dimension? 
• Do UFOs use hidden inter-dimensional gateways to reach our world and enter our reality? 

Before I continue writing, it is essential to point out that the purpose of this article is not to prove the existence of Unidentified Flying Objects.

It is not my intention to convince skeptics that we are and have always been visited by extraterrestrials. Although it is fair to say this is a complex subject, any curious investigator will discover that a comprehensive and objective analysis of the UFO phenomenon clearly shows that we are not alone in the universe. It is correct to say that a number of UFO sightings can be dismissed and easily explained away, but let us not forget the unexplained cases. Countless UFO reports, photographs, world-wide mass-sightings, testimonies from high-ranked officials, photographs taken by NASA astronauts sightings obviously speak for themselves.

Mainstream Science and UFOs -- Curious, Creative and Critical Thinking

Mainstream Science and UFOs

 

"In their public statements (but not necessarily in their private statements), scientists express a generally negative attitude towards the UFO problem, and it is interesting to try to understand this attitude. 

Most scientists have never had the occasion to confront evidence concerning the UFO phenomenon. To a scientist, the main source of hard information (other than his own experiments' observations) is provided by the scientific journals. With rare exceptions, scientific journals do not publish reports of UFO observations. 

The decision not to publish is made by the editor acting on the advice of reviewers. This process is self-reinforcing: the apparent lack of data confirms the view that there is nothing to the UFO phenomenon, and this view works against the presentation of relevant data." 

Dr. Peter A. Sturrock, Professor of Space Science and Astrophysics and Deputy Director of the Center for Space Sciences and Astrophysics at Stanford University; Director of the Skylab Workshop on Solar Flares in 1977. (Sturrock, Peter A., "An Analysis of the Condon Report on the Colorado UFO Project," Journal of Scientific Exploration, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1987.

Curious, Creative and Critical Thinking

Peter Sturrock, Center for Space Science and Astrophysics, Stanford University

Summary: In this essay, I will argue that scientists need at least three modes of thought that I call "curious," "creative" and "critical." These requirements, though they may be quite general in their applicability, come sharply into focus when one deals with anomalies within mainstream science or with anomalous phenomena that seem to reside outside of science as we know it.

Peter A. Sturrock ,  Ph.D.

author's bio

---

The Responsible approach to Exploring the Unknown 

Edward Ginzion, one of the founders of Varian Associates, once remarked, concerning his colleague Russell Varian, that "he had several modes of thought, of which logical thinking was only one." So it is, most likely, with all great inventors, and so it is, I believe, with all truly productive scientists. In this essay, I will argue that scientists need at least three modes of thought that I call curious, creative, and critical.