learning Ufology -- 别再把UFO称作光点了

LEARNING UFOLOGY

Jeremy Thomas

Please Translate and Spread.

Your translations can be posted here. 

Kindly send them to

luisavasconcellos2012@gmail.com

Stop calling UFOs to dots.

别再把UFO称作光点了

Stop calling UFOs to dots in a black background, these dots can be anything, resolve the structure behind the dots and show what is the structure of these dots.

别再把UFO称作黑暗背景中的光点了，这些光点可能是任何东西，通过对这些光点的背景进行解析，显示出这些光点的结构。

The use of low optical magnification in many active observers, mainly people doing night time observation and some doing day time observations is pervasive.

许多活动的观察者使用低倍光学放大，人们普遍在夜晚进行观察，也有一些人在白天进行观察。

With low optical magnification equipment any small object not very far away will be reduced to a dot.

在低倍放大的设备中，任何距离不远的小物体都将被缩小为一个光点。

0.32 – Many of these night time observers use the cascade image intensifier p8079hp with 50mm lens, that combination is a wide field view combination with an optical magnification of 2x, just 2x.

0.32—这些夜间观察者当中，有许多都使用的是50毫米镜头的p8079hp型级联式图像增强器，那种组合是一种只有2倍光学放大的广角组合。

With this kind of setup any object of one feet span at more than 1,500 feet =      away will be reduced to a dot, almost any bird is around 1 feet span, so a bird at 2000 feet away will be reduced to a dot without any apparent wing flipping. That bird flying in a straight line will be undistinguishable from a satellite

在这种设置下，任何一英尺大小的物体，在1500英尺远的地方都将会被缩小成一个光点，几乎所有的鸟类都是1英尺大小，所以一只2000英尺外的鸟类将会缩小成一个看不到翅膀扇动的点状物。如果那只鸟沿直线飞行，将无法与人造卫星区别开来。

0.58 – The following are the steps that are followed in this channel in the processing of footage from any anomaly, this will show that the dots that these people have been calling UFOs for years are very likely nothing more than anomalies. Remember that almost as a rule these people use single digits optical magnification equipment, really very poor.

0.58—以下是随着这个在镜头处理频道的步骤所揭示的异常，这将会显示出已经被这些人好多年称为UFO的光点，非常可能无非就是光学异常现象。记住，几乎作为一条规则，这些人所使用的简单数码光学放大设备，都是非常简陋的。

1.17 – This is an anomaly spotted in IR at 26x optical magnification, just a dot like any other dot, like the dots that many people had called UFOs for years, almost always assuming that these are some “crafts” or mechanical artifacts.

1.17—这是一个在红外26倍光学放大设备中所发现的光点，就像其它光点一样，就像许多人多年称作UFO的光点一样，几乎总是假设这些是某种“飞行器”或机械飞行器。

1.32 – This is now the same dot as seen by a telephoto 1100mm lens and using in prime focus a 1/2.55 megapixels board camera, this gives 150x optical magnification, the original resolution was 2592x1920, 2K

1.32- 现在这个，还是同一个光点，却用的是一部1100毫米的长焦镜头，并用的是一部焦点在1/2.55万像素的监控摄像头，这台设备有150倍光学放大，光学分辨率是2592x1920像素，也就是2K高清。

1.52 – Now that is the cropping at half HD 960 x 540of the lower left corner of previous frame.

1.52- 现在这个，是对前一帧的左下角，进行半高清960x540像素的裁剪。

2.12 – And now this is the cropping corner expanded at full HD 1920x1080, total magnification 150x2 = 300.

2.12- 还有现在这个，这是将裁剪的部分完全放大到高清1920x1080像素，总共放大150x2=300倍后的画面。

2.32 – That is the process followed almost always in this channel;

2.32- 这是几乎总是在这个频道中所处理的镜头。

1 – Dot spotted in IR, as any other dot, as the dots many call UFO without really knowing the structure behind the dot.

1 – 光点在红外模式中被发现，就像任何其它光点一样，就像许多人并不真正知道光点背后的结构，而称作的光点一样。

2 – That dot is placed in the field of view of a scope with high optical magnification 150x and a 5 megapixels camera, each frame in the footage will be 2592x 1920 pixels.

2 – 那个光点位于一台150倍放大，500万像素的摄影机视野中，画面中的每一帧都是2592x1920像素。

2.52 – If at that resolution the object is an unknown (anomaly) then recording is done in the high optical magnification scope.

2.52 – 如果在那种分辨率下，物体还是未知（异常）的话，那么录像就会在高倍放大镜投下完成。

             ALWAYS whenever the dots have been unknown the object was an “anomaly”, nothing remotely similar to any craft of any time,

             任何时候，一旦有什么光点是未知的，而物体是一个“异常现象”，那么它总是与任何时候的任何飞行器不尽相同。

             

             Anomalies behave like living beings, but they defy any kind of mundane explanation.

行为举止像生物的异常物体，但是他们却藐视任何一种寻常的解释。

3.13 – So all these people that have been calling dots UFOs forever, do you think that “their” dots are different from the same dots spotted by my equipment?

3.13 – 因此，所有这些永远都把光点称作UFO的人，你们认为“他们的”光点跟我的设备所发现的光点有什么不同吗？

When the dots are “resolved” anomalies are revealed, if they think that their dots are something else then they should use better equipment and resolve their dots showing something different.  

当光点被“高清解析”后，异常物体的秘密也就解开了，如果他们认为他们的光点是别的什么东西，那么他们应该用更好的设备，并且将他们的光点放大解析，直到显示出某些不同的东西。

The bar had been raised, dots need to be resolved in their structure, otherwise how do really know what is behind your dot?

阻挡道路的栅栏已经挪开，而光点也需要在他们的结构中被解析，否则怎样才能真正知道你的光点背后是什么？

譯者：東方明珠