1952 - YEAR OF THE UFO
|
FIFTY YEARS AGO, during the most amazing flap of
flying saucer sightings in the USA (and the world), the Air Force ALMOST
admitted that at least some sightings of UFOs/saucers were sightings of objects
not made here. However, when that opportunity arose during a large press
conference in late July, instead of admitting that the Air Force couldn't
explain all sightings and that some "high officials" were seriously
considering the "interplanetary hypothesis," the Air Force (General
Samford) said everything could be explained as natural phenomena, effectively
slamming the lid down on the UFO subject. But what the Air Force said privately
was a different matter. This report tells the story of what happened in that
amazing year.
Pre-History
The world became aware of flying saucer sightings in the summer of
1947 with the nationwide/worldwide publication of the report by Kenneth Arnold
on June 24. In the subsequent weeks hundreds to thousands of sightings were
reported in the local press throughout the USA and in other parts of the world.
The Air Force quickly became involved because some of the AF pilots (and many
commercial pilots) were also witnesses. The Air Force quickly and publicly
denied having any secret projects that could account for UFO sightings. This denial
was made privately to the director of the FBI at a time when the AF asked the
FBI to investigate sightings (yes, there was an "X" file). The FBI
found no evidence of communist subversive activities or communist sympathizers
involved in saucer sightings and stopped actively investigating in the fall of
1947. The Air Force carried on, however, compiling collections of sighting
reports by AF pilots and other qualified observers. By the fall of 1947 the Air
Force Air Materiel Command (AMC) at Wright Field (Wright Patterson Air Force
Base) had concluded that flying saucers were "real and not visionary"
(statement in a report by General Nathan Twining, head of AMC at the time) and
required a special investigation group to determine what they were and where they
came from. In early 1948 the investigation group, called PROJECT SIGN was set
up.
By late 1947 the official position of the Air Force, that there
was no unknown phenomenon causing flying saucer/UFO sightings, was well known
and generally accepted by the scientific community and the major news media.
Witnesses were often criticized or made the butt of jokes for reporting
"impossible things." Nevertheless, sighting reports continued beyond
1947. Agencies responsible for security around nuclear power and atomic bomb
installations were startled by sightings near secure areas starting in late
1948 and continuing through 1949 and 1950 ("green fireball" sightings
and associated phenomena). In 1950 a special project (TWINKLE) managed to
obtain film of unidentified, high speed, high altitude objects flying over
White Sands. This evidence was rejected and/or suppressed.
In late 1949 the Air Force issued a "final report" (the
GRUDGE Report) which claimed that all sightings to that time had been
explained. This report was later criticized by the General in charge of Air
Force Intelligence (AFI), General Cabell, who called it worthless as
"tripe." Nevertheless, it became the official word of the Air Force
and the American people were told that the AF had closed its saucer
investigation. It had not, however, as GRUDGE continued into 1951.
In the fall of 1951 General Cabell became aware of a publicized
sighting (at Fort Monmouth, NJ) which interested him because it involved radar.
He asked for a briefing on the investigation of that case. At the briefing he
was told that, for all practical purposes, the saucer/UFO investigation project
was dead. At the very least it was not following his earlier instructions to
investigate all sightings. Cabell was angry. He realized that those under him
had lied about the project. He ordered that the project be reorganized and
revitalized under new management.
This reorganization, which began in the fall of 1951 under the
direction of Capt. Edward Ruppelt, was underway at the Air Technical
Intelligence Center (ATIC) at Wright Patterson AFB when 1952 "hit."
The name of the project was changed in March, 1952, to BLUE BOOK, a name that
became famous as the years went by. Ruppelt was the director from late 1951
through 1953. It was the most unbiased, scientifically-oriented and publicly
known UFO investigation by the Air Force. (It is likely that there were other
investigations which were not, and are still not publicly known.)
The Air Force officers and personnel who continued PROJECT BLUE BOOK after Ruppelt were not as unbiased as Ruppelt and the scientific quality of the project deteriorated in the following years. (BLUE BOOK was formally closed in 1969 after collecting and about 13,000 sightings of which about 700 were left as unexplained.) PROJECT BLUE BOOK was just getting underway and was ill equipped to handle the Year of the UFO. Nevertheless, the information collected during that time has lived on as a great mystery. We are left asking, what really happened and why did the Air Force cover it up?
The Air Force officers and personnel who continued PROJECT BLUE BOOK after Ruppelt were not as unbiased as Ruppelt and the scientific quality of the project deteriorated in the following years. (BLUE BOOK was formally closed in 1969 after collecting and about 13,000 sightings of which about 700 were left as unexplained.) PROJECT BLUE BOOK was just getting underway and was ill equipped to handle the Year of the UFO. Nevertheless, the information collected during that time has lived on as a great mystery. We are left asking, what really happened and why did the Air Force cover it up?
ENTER, 1952, THE YEAR OF THE UFO
A whole UFO book could be written about this one year, during
which ATIC received about two thousand sighting reports! What I present here
will only scratch the surface of that amazing year.
During the latter half of 1951 there were important changes in the
UFO project at ATIC and also in Air Force Intelligence at the Pentagon. In
November, General John A. Samford replaced General Cabell as Director of
Intelligence (Cabell became the Director of the Joint Staff for the Joint
Chiefs of Staff at the Pentagon and a year or so later retired from the Air
force and became an assistant director of the CIA). The new Air Force
Intelligence Director soon learned that that the subject of UFOs received top
level attention. There was also a change at ATIC: Col. Frank Dunn replaced the
previous command (Col. Watson). At the first meeting between Dunn and the New
GRUDGE (soon to be BLUE BOOK) staff (Ruppelt), Dunn asked Samford if the United
States had a secret weapon that could explain the saucer sightings. Once again
the answer was a firm no.
THE GENERAL'S SAUCER
On January 3, 1952, Brig. Gen. William M. Garland, Assistant for
the Production of Intelligence, wrote a memorandum for General Samford with the
title “(SECRET) Contemplated Action to Determine the Nature and Origin of the
Phenomena Connected with the Reports of Unusual Flying Objects.” This
memorandum begins as follows:
1. The continued
reports of unusual flying objects requires positive action to determine the
nature and origin of the phenomena. The action taken thus far has been designed
to track down and evaluate reports from casual observers throughout the
country. Thus far, this action has produced results of doubtful value and the
inconsistencies inherent in the nature of the reports has given neither
positive nor negative proof of the claims.
Here we find a general in Air Force Intelligence (AFI) admitting
that there was no negative proof of the claims. Yet the Air Force had been
saying publicly for several years that there was “negative proof”...that all
sightings had been explained. Clearly the men “on the inside” were more honest
with each other than with the American people about the fact they had not been
able to prove flying saucers were only mistakes or figments of the imagination.
By this time it had become a standard procedure to appeal to the
Soviet Menace in order to legitimize requests for action and the expenditure of
funds. General Garland, too, justified the added effort he would propose by
referring to the potential Soviet threat:
2. It is logical to
relate the reported sightings to the known development of aircraft, jet
propulsion, rockets and range extension capabilities in Germany and the
U.S.S.R. In this connection, it is to be noted that certain developments by the
Germans, particularly the Horten wing, jet propulsion, and refueling, combined
with their extensive employment of V-1 and V-2 weapons during World War II,
lend credence to the possibility that the flying objects may be of German and
Russian origin. The developments mentioned above were contemplated and
operational between 1941 and 1944 and subsequently fell into the hands of the
Soviets at the end of the war. There is evidence that the Germans were working
on these projects as far back as 1931 to 1938. Therefore, it may be assumed
that the Germans had at least a 7 to 10 year lead over the United States in the
development of rockets, jet engines and aircraft of the Horton-wing design. The
Air Corps developed refueling experimentally as early as 1928, but did not
develop operational capability until 1948.
Notice how “cleverly” the general has described the possible
threat from Russian developments based on German war research and has concluded
that the Russians might have a 7 to 10 year lead on the United States in
producing advanced aircraft. Nowhere did he mention that the same argument had
been rejected in previous years because (a) the ATIC and AFI investigators in
1947 and again in 1948 could not accept the idea that the Soviets were that far
ahead of us and (b) even if they were that far ahead they would never fly their
advanced aircraft over the United States (we wouldn’t do the reverse). Could it
be that he didn’t know about the previous rejection of the “Soviet Hypothesis?”
Could it be that he was not sufficiently intelligent to deduce for himself that
the idea of the Soviets testing their advanced aircraft over the United States
was ridiculous? Or could it be that he actually doubted the Soviet Hypothesis
but used it anyway to justify spending money on saucer investigation? (We will
shortly see how this same ploy was used by a top defense scientist to get money
for a trip to Europe to study, among other things, flying saucer sightings!!)
Having established a “credible” threat General
Garland continued:
3. In view of the
above facts and the persistent reports of unusual flying objects over parts of
the United States, particularly the east and west coast and in the vicinity of
the atomic energy production and testing facilities it is apparent that
positive action must be taken to determine the nature of the objects and, if
possible, their origin. Since it is a known fact that the Soviets did not
detonate an atomic bomb prior to 1949, it is believed possible that the Soviets
may have developed the German aircraft designs at an accelerated rate in order
to have a suitable carrier for the delivery of weapons of mass destruction. In
other words, the Soviet may have a carrier without the weapons required while
we have relatively superior weapons with relatively inferior carriers
available. If the Soviets should get the carrier and the weapon, combined with
adequate defensive aircraft, they might surpass us technoloically for a
sufficient period of time to permit them to execute a decisive air campaign
against the United States and her allies. The basic philosophy of the Soviets
has been to surpass the western powers technologically and the Germans may have
given them the opportunity.
In the preceding paragraph the general pressed
two “hot buttons.” One was the reference to sightings of UFOs/saucers/strange
phenomena over the atomic installations (green fireballs and the "disc
variation" seen starting in December 1948 and continuing through 1949 and
1950 with occasional reports in 1951). These installations were considered the
keystone to our development of defensive atomic weapons (nowadays called
“weapons of mass destruction”). Although the Air Force publicly played down the
importance of these sightings, it is clear that, privately, the top officials
were worried, or at least paying attention. The other hot button was the fact
that the Soviets, now with a known nuclear capability, might have a delivery
system superior to the bombers of the United States and her allies.
The general concluded:
4. In view of the
facts oulined above it is considered mandatory that the Air Force take positive
action at once to definitely determine the nature and, if possible, the origin
of the reported unusual flying objects. The following action is now
contemplated:
a) require ATIC to provide at least three teams
to be matched up with an equal number of teams from ADC (Air Defense Command)
for the purpose of taking radar scope photographs and visual photographs of the
phenomena
b) select sites for these teams based on concentrations of already reported sightings over the United States (these areas are, generally, the Seattle area, the Albuquerque area and the New York-Philadelphia area) and
c) take the initial steps in this project during early January, 1952.”
b) select sites for these teams based on concentrations of already reported sightings over the United States (these areas are, generally, the Seattle area, the Albuquerque area and the New York-Philadelphia area) and
c) take the initial steps in this project during early January, 1952.”
It is obvious that the general wanted action,
ostensibly to protect the United States from the possible Soviet advancements
in aeronautical research. However, information contained in a memorandum
written by Capt. Ruppelt and contained within his private papers, suggests that
Garland may have had an ulterior motive, a hidden reason for wanting a better
UFO investigation! According to Ruppelt, “Gen. Garland was my boss at ATIC from
the fall of 1952 until I left. He was a moderately confirmed believer. He had
seen a UFO while he was stationed in Sacremento, California. He was Gen.
Samford’s assistant in the Pentagon before he came to ATIC...”
Only a "moderately" confirmed believer? He had seen one? (Keep in mind the official story: they don't exist, so seeing one is impossible!...so if you see one, DON'T LOOK!).
One may conclude that his observation, at the very least,
convinced him that something unexplained was "out there" and flying
around. He may have privately rejected the Soviet explanation but used it
anyway as a justification for research because he wanted the research done but
didn't want to mention the "interplanetary hypothesis" that had been
rejected in 1948 by General Vandenberg. This possibility gains further support
from what he did only a month or so after this document was written: he
suggested the interplanetary hypothesis to writers of a LIFE Magazine article!
Ruppelt began the process of carrying out Garland’s
recommendations, but it was slow going. By the time things were starting to
move in the late spring PROJECT BLUE BOOK (PBB)was swamped with sightings. The
investigation teams proposed by the general were never formed but a plan for
instrumentally recording sighting information was carried out. According to a
PBB staff Study (written in July), in June the Air Defense Command (ADC) issued
a requirement that radar scope cameras be available to radar operators. During
the spring and summer of 1952 the Collection Division of ATIC developed a
stereo camera with a diffraction grating for color analysis of photographed
objects. ATIC ordered 100 of these special cameras to be delivered in
September. PBB planned to give these cameras to military and civilian control
tower operators and to the Ground Observer Corps. Too bad these cameras arrived
too late for the big flap!
INTERPLANETARY MARILYN
The April 7, 1952, issue of LIFE Magazine....an
issue that would not soon be forgotten!! The cover of this issue was an
irresistible combination of sultry sex and saucers. It shows a dreamy...or is
it sleepy?...Marilyn (you know which Marilyn!), with her eyes half open and her
luxuriously loose dress slid well down below her shoulders. She was the “talk
of Hollywood,” the cover asserted. For those who could remove their eyes from
her provocative appearance there was, in the upper right hand corner of the
cover, a statement which must have come as a shock to many people: “There is a
case for interplanetary saucers.”
No comments:
Post a Comment