https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9ieCYiJvg4
0.0 - Three key steps for observing anomalies
0.07 –The three basic key steps/points needed to be able to systematically observe anomalies are:
2- High optical magnification to be able to resolve a distant object in its details.
3- Active direct signalling.
I will be explaining each one of them next in more detail.
0.37 – 1- Infrared spotting:
All accumulated observational experience shows that almost all anomalies are visible to naked eye if they are close enough, as any other "normal" object, but as any other normal object when it is beyond certain distance in the atmosphere in daylight, it will be masked by the sky scattering of visible light, many small objects in the atmosphere are not visible to naked eye when just a little far away, like bugs, small birds, etc. But almost all of them will be spotted in infrared.
1.07 - Anomalies are usually small and bright, many have colors very close to the blue sky color, they are very hard to spot with naked eye when relatively far away and experience shows that anomalies usually move at high altitudes, so they will be beyond naked eye spotting, but they will be easily spotted in infrared, not because the are "cloaked", that is a myth, simply because they are masked by the sky scattering of visible light in daylight exactly as the stars are.
1.37 - So to spot anomalies in daylight infrared spotting is a lot better than simple naked eye spotting in the same spotting method that man had used forever, technology is here so we should use it.
Now to do an effective infrared spotting a "modified" digital camera is recommended and the use of a 850nm or 950nm IR pass filter.
A cheap cs-mount security camera will be perfect; I had used very successfully a LG LCB5100 modified security camera.
2.07 - Now together with this camera some lens are required, experience shows that a 20x optical magnification will be very good to spot many of the small objects that move inside the atmosphere, if using a standard 1/3 sensor size (6mm) security camera as the LG LCB5100 a lens that reach around 120mm focal length will be enough, experience also shows that zoom lens are very good for this. I use regularly a 16mm-160mm zoom lens, that will give a reach of 160/6=26x optical magnification.
2.37 - Two anomalies, we need to "resolve" these dots structure details to be able to start making any educated implications about their nature; so far the only thing that we can say is that they are "anomalous".
2.56 - 2- High optical magnification to be able to resolve a distant object in its details.
The infrared spotting part will usually provide just dots, small dots moving in a black background as in the previous segment, the same dots at lower magnification than even this spotting part that many still call UFOs, or "crafts" without really knowing what is behind the dots. So we need a high magnification scope that will be able to "resolve" the details of these dots.
3.26 - Estimates and experience show that a 150x optical magnification will be almost always enough to resolve the details of many small objects moving inside the atmosphere, anomalies structure details will be almost always resolved using that kind of magnification. Remember that the "optical magnification" of a given telescope-camera combination is equal to the ratio between the scope focal length and the camera sensor size, so cameras with smaller sensor sizes will be better for obtaining higher magnification.
3.56 - That is why the superzoom cameras as the Canon sx50 or sx60, or the Nikon p600 or p900 all of them have a sensor size of 7.6mm, compare that to the DSLR cameras sensor size of more than 20mm usually and that will give you an idea why DSLR cameras are not really good for obtaining high optical magnification with scopes or lens with relatively low focal length.
But even when the superzoom cameras are very good for recording anomalies at naked eye distances, they falter on the anomalies that are beyond that distances.
4.26 - The combination of an infrared spotting and a high magnification scope is called a dual optical system; dual optical systems were already recommended by Project Blue Book to systematically observe the unidentified objects reported.
4.46 - The camera on the right is the spotter camera using a 950nm IR filter and the system on the left allow to have 140x optical magnification, or 280x optical magnification, or 280x optical magnification with a 2x extender, using a camera with a 7.16mm sensor size.
5.06 - 3 - Active direct signalling.
By this we mean any direct "physical" signals that we can send directly to anomalies. Experience shows that anomalies get "interested" in "smart" signals, if the signals are send to an area of the sky before seeing any anomalies, after a while anomalies may appear in that area, but even more if signals are sent to anomalies directly after they have been spotted then their "interest" in your location will increase and their behavior will change.
5.36 - In daylight in a clear sky the simplest way to send signals is to use a mirror, something that had been used by man for hundreds of years, simple, effective. Also short radio waves can be used.
The extraordinary thing about anomalies is that by sending direct signals to them consistently, I always sent them sequence of primes numbers, you can "modulate" their shapes, anomalies are intrinsically polymorphic, they shape shift/morph continuously, that allows them to "mimic" many things, almost anything.
6.06 - Experience also shows that anomalies that are beyond naked eye distances will have a more shape-shifting/morphing state, perhaps a more "natural" state for them.
But also experience shows that when anomalies get closer to human naked eye spotting distances they adopt "mimic" shapes that allow them to be almost unnoticed by unsuspecting human observers, the "usual" shapes that they take are "balloons" or "plastic bags".
6.36 - But we already have solid footage showing the "transformation" of an amorphous anomaly to a mimic balloon-shaped anomaly.
It appears then that there is like a "twilight zone" beyond naked eye human sight capabilities were anomalies can be observed in their "natural" polymorphic/shape-shifting/morphing states, but when they "cross" into potential human naked eye sighting capabilities they transform usually into mimic shapes.
7.06 - When studying anomalies a strict objective approach is needed without any preconceived ideas about the nature of anomalies.
Consistent observational data is king and we must accept what that data dictate.
Many "scientists" had failed in that basic scientific tenet of accepting what observational data commands; they simply had rejected the data and had not done any observations of their own, the old unscientific reaction to new ideas and facts all over again.
7.36 - As we had said before nothing can replace direct experience, you should not take anything that is claimed here on faith, nor you should take on faith anything that "experts" may say, anomalies can be observed by anyone and nobody is stopping you from doing just that.
Anomalies as living beings.
Anomalies/UFOs as Living Beings.
0.0 – Anomalies/UFOs as Living Beings.
0.07 – Almost anybody that had done direct observations of anomalies, or so called UFOs, will reach the conclusion that these autonomous flying objects are living beings. "Second Generation Data": Data where the structure details of this flying objects is clearly seen, is fully compatible with that conclusion reached by many, between this many is even the "father" or coiner of the abused phrase: "flying saucers" Kenneth Arnold. It seems that Ufology, very likely, will be "reduced" to a segment of Biology.
0.37 - Autonomous anomalous flying object moving through clouds. 11/13/15.
0.47 - Kenneth Arnold, Nov 1962, quoting:
"After some 14 years of extensive research, it is my conclusion that the so-called unidentified flying objects that have been seen in our atmosphere are not space ships from another planet at all, but are groups and masses of living organisms that are as much a part of our atmosphere and space as the life we find in the depths of the oceans."
1.17 – Autonomous anomalous flying object in IR, 11/11/15.
1.28 – Close-ups of previous anomaly.
1.50 - Anthony Woods, quote:
"The more I see these objects the more I am certain they are living individual life forces of some sort rather than manufactured vehicles."
2.10 – Vertical undulating anomaly 8/21/15.
2.29 - Jeff Woolwine reached the same conclusion, quoting:
"In my personal sightings and fieldwork in this type of investigation and my personal beliefs on this topic, I believe that if we see five lights in the sky?? it’s not some space craft that you see...but five living beings that has always been among us...just as the oceanographers find new species of life within the ocean...this is another species of life within the ocean...this is another species of life that scientists hasn't found yet..."
2.59 – Boomerang anomaly 3/30/15.
3.31– And that also was believed by Trevor J. Constable, the pioneer in Anomalies observations, read for example his book: The Cosmic pulse of Life, that belief was also based in direct observations.
3.51 - There are many more examples in this channel and in many other channels in YouTube where this "aliveness" character of anomalies is clearly seen.
With the use of higher optical magnification equipment expanding to more active observers’ second generation data will be more abundant and more solid evidence will be available.
The time of footage presenting only dots of lights without structure is coming to an end, second generation data footage is here to stay.
Direct Communication with Anomalies p01
0.0 - Direct Communication with anomalies.
0.07 - The reality of anomalies is already beyond doubts, at least for the people that regularly are observing them around the world and that number is increasing constantly, the wide spreading of this reality to general population is really unstoppable.
Now beyond the "simple “acknowledging of this reality I had been sending consistent direct signals to anomalies, always following the prime numbers sequence.
0.27 - Consistent repetitions is a very well-known and effective teaching technique, we all had learned our first language using that technique.
These had been the consistent methods to send signals to anomalies that I had used:
1- Mirror reflections: using a mirror to send direct signals to anomalies.
2- Short radio waves: Using short radio waves pulses in prime numbers sequences.
3- Using big boards representing digits.
0.57 - Simple mirror used to send direct signals to anomalies.
1.07 - Using a dish antenna to send pulses in prime numbers of short radio waves in 2.5 ghz frequency.
1.17 - Using a big board seen from "above" representing digits 3 and 5. 1.27 - Now the natural question to ask is: Had anomalies "responded" in any "correlated" way to signals sent to them?
And the answer is definitely YES in multiple levels, first using a mirror and sending direct signals to them some of these anomalies responded by making a huge flash, a really big increase in brightness that can´t be attributed to reflections and is directly correlated to the signals sent to them. This "simple" response is really an unequivocal proof of their anomalous nature.
1.57 - But their "responses" had gone well beyond that "simple" flash acknowledging the signals sent to them. In several occasions anomalies had formed, changing their geometry the very digits "3" and "5" that had been sent to them recurrently.
I will present short segments where anomalies clearly change geometry forming digits 3 and 5.
2.17 - Highly polymorphic anomaly on 8/23/15 footage at 1/4 speed. (2015-08-23 - Sunday)
2.33 - It is clear that this object has dynamic geometry. (2015-08-23 - Sunday)
3.21 - This is the same anomaly a few minutes before morphing into digits.
3.54 - Polymorphic anomaly and Digit "3" on 5/23/15.
4.32 - There are other examples of anomalies forming primes digits in this channel.
In the same way that the "validation" of the reality of anomalies is by direct observation of them using HIGH magnification optical equipment, the validation of these results have to be done trying to duplicate results like these ones where anomalies "respond" in a correlated way to direct signals sent to them.
Nobody is stopping you from doing just that.
Direct Communication with Anomalies P02
0.0 - Direct Communication with anomalies # 2.
0.07 - We already had seen anomalies forming prime digits, we had seen two anomalies morphing into digits "3" and "5" respectively on 03/30/14, the on 05/23/15 I recorded one anomaly morphing from digit "3" to digit "5" several times.
I had also recorded anomalies forming alone digits "3" or digit "5" several times.
It is a recurrent occurrence that definitely is correlated to the signals that are sent to anomalies.
0.27 - Then on 10/22/15 at 6:23pm EST. I spotted a "balloon" shaped anomaly with a strange "tether", further examining the footage frame by frame it can be seen that this tether was morphing into prime digits, digits "5" and "7" are clearly visible, digit "3" too.
As almost always this anomaly was spotted in infrared not visible to the naked eye, I will present first frames where the prime digits are clearly visible, then I will present the raw footage that you can download and see by yourself frame by frame and verify this amazing fact.
0.57 - 2015-10-22 Thursday 6:23:28 pm.
1.29 - Anomalies can be considered as "messages" in themselves, the evidence for that is really very strong, the search for intelligence elsewhere needs to be done with an open mind, expecting that intelligences different from us will use our own means of communication as radio waves only is a very narrow approach and a "human" centric approach.
Next the raw footage of this anomaly.
1.59 - 2015-10-22 Thursday 6:23:25 pm.
Direct communication with Anomalies p03
0.0 – Polymorphic anomaly almost static, tracked from 3:08pm to 5:12pm, more than two hours.
0.19 – Previous footage taken with camera on right in IR, next close-ups with camera on left.
Celestrom 1000mm telescope, using 2x extender.
Spotter camera with 16-160mm lens, 950nm IR filter.
0.33 - The recurrent digit "5" 2015-11-09 Monday 15:08:15
0.53 -Digit "5" again.
1.58 - Footage at 3:08pm when first spotted.
2.44- At 4:56pm, getting low in the horizon.
3.oo - At 5:09pm, very low in the horizon.
3.11 - This footage is one more example that direct signalling to anomalies can have correlated "responses" from them.
This kind of results have far reaching implications, one of these implications is that "communication" with anomalies is a real possibility and at the same time this shows that some anomalies are intelligent beings or the"constructs" of intelligent beings.
Anomalies also are "messages" in themselves as this kind of footage clearly shows.
Direct Communication with Anomalies/UFOs p04
0.0 – Direct Communication with Anomalies, a review.
0.07 – This footage will present short segments of several instances where anomalies had formed digits shapes. These examples are a strong indication that anomalies are "messages" in themselves and that sending consistent signals to anomalies can "modulate" the shapes that they take, this process of "learning" how to communicate with anomalies will be a very long one, not surprising as the process of learning our first language usually is a long one, very likely this will be longer, but it had been fascinating from the start.
0.27 - 03/30/14 3:40pm this was the first indication that anomalies were "responding" in correlation to signals sent to them.
0.53 - Digits "3" and "5".
1.00 - If we had followed the pervasive and pathological tendency in current "scientific" mindset to dismiss as "explainable" almost everything we have dismissed it as two "balloons" tied together in fly, the "obvious" explanation.
But we rejected that pathological mindset long ago and the following video captures fully vindicated that. There is a systemic and deep dis-functionality in current scientific mentality; the reality of anomalies is just one aspect that fully confirms that dis-functionality.
0.20 - 04/12/14 1:14pm, digit "3".
1.49 - Digit "3".
1.53 - 04/12/14 1:55pm. Highly polymorphic anomaly with clear shape changes from frame to frame.
2.00 - This object is impossible to "explain" as a balloon, with this type of objects the debunkers are silenced forever.
2.24 - 08/19/14 5:58pm. This is an IR segment showing the characteristic glowing pulsation and sparks of anomalies.
2.32 - 08/19/14 5:58pm. Digit "1" anomaly.
2.56 - 09/01/14 6:44pm. Digit "5" anomaly.
